Author Topic: Why was Vader so loyal???
Date Posted: 10/4/09 7:37am Subject: Why was Vader so loyal???
eht13 posted:
Well, I mostly meant we've been told that by the movie.


Which movie do you mean? Do you mean by logical inference from TPM? If so, I agree. But we've never been explicitly told this.

eht13 posted:
But I do wonder if Qui-Gon's explanation addresses what would happen if limbs containing cells were lost, because it is a reasonable question.


We see how a midichlorian count is taken in TPM, and we are told that it is a cell concentration.

 

-----signature-----
"You're not the devil. You're practice." - Bruce Wayne
Bless the Maker and His water. Bless the coming and going of Him. May His passage cleanse the world.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Date Posted: 10/4/09 8:20am Subject: Why was Vader so loyal???
Jabba_The_Hutt_123 posted:
Didn't Palpatine tell Dooku that he would intervene to save his life?
If so that is an outright lie.
Didn't Palpatine tell Anakin that he could save Padme from death, then later say he didn't actually know how to but together they could do it?
Didn't he promise Gunray peace? You can argue as he's dead he's at peace but even so.

Though I do agree, he is very good at manipulating rather than outright, like the Jedi planning to take over, he just failed to mention they were taking over because a sith lord was in charge and would become a dictator.


Well Sidious lied via omission, leading people to believe things that were not true - and he knew what they believed as it is what he wanted them to believe. He worked generally against the Jedi and the Republic, leading them to believe he was working with them; he lead Anakin to believe he was a kindly old grandfather as he manipulated him toward Sithdom; he led Anakin to believe he could save Padme and Dooku to believe he would save him from slaughter. Padme and Obi-Wan both believed he was looking out for their mortal interests based on his words. He was a proficient manipulating scammer. As for Gunray, Sidious may have promised him peace - although it is just as likely that with the holo-static Sidious actually did promise to leave him in pieces...

 

-----signature-----
I say we put together a 'kill squad' and assassinate
Darth Krayt. Who's with me?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Date Posted: 10/4/09 8:24am Subject: Why was Vader so loyal???
But we have no guarantee that the Basic word for "peace" sounds anything like the Basic word for "piece". tongue

 

-----signature-----
"You're not the devil. You're practice." - Bruce Wayne
Bless the Maker and His water. Bless the coming and going of Him. May His passage cleanse the world.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
-1_
Pocu 
Date Posted: 10/6/09 11:13am Subject: Why was Vader so loyal???
Arawn_Fenn posted:
Pocu posted:
Are you sure?

Yes.

Faith in your rightness, misplaced may be wink
Could you give any reasons for your opinion? I have already given mine.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
807 posts
8156_Clone Trooper
eht13 
Date Posted: 10/6/09 12:33pm Subject: Why was Vader so loyal???
Arawn_Fenn posted:
eht13 posted:
Well, I mostly meant we've been told that by the movie.


Which movie do you mean? Do you mean by logical inference from TPM? If so, I agree. But we've never been explicitly told this.

eht13 posted:
But I do wonder if Qui-Gon's explanation addresses what would happen if limbs containing cells were lost, because it is a reasonable question.


We see how a midichlorian count is taken in TPM, and we are told that it is a cell concentration.


Some more about this here wink

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Date Posted: 10/6/09 3:30pm Subject: Why was Vader so loyal??? - Date Edited: 10/6/09 3:30pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Arawn_Fenn
Pocu posted:
Could you give any reasons for your opinion?


I already did. The quote was: We see how a midichlorian count is taken in TPM, and we are told that it is a cell concentration.

 

-----signature-----
"You're not the devil. You're practice." - Bruce Wayne
Bless the Maker and His water. Bless the coming and going of Him. May His passage cleanse the world.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
-1_
Pocu 
Date Posted: 10/8/09 12:13pm Subject: Why was Vader so loyal??? - Date Edited: 10/8/09 12:51pm (2 edits total) Edited By: Pocu
Arawn_Fenn posted:
Pocu posted:
Could you give any reasons for your opinion?

I already did. The quote was: We see how a midichlorian count is taken in TPM, and we are told that it is a cell concentration.

Yes, we were told that. But we are not aware what happens if the cells are lost, are we?
In case Vader has been cloned and his limbs were replaced with living copies he might keep his midichlorian count because of reproduction of the midi-s within the new cells. It would be still in question but it could be acceptable. But he obtained metal limbs which are not alive. So, you cannot claim the count remains the same as the midichlorians stood "homeless".

Edit: I might have ask this question on the right place, but it is quite discouraging to read all those 24 pages.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Date Posted: 10/8/09 3:45pm Subject: Why was Vader so loyal??? - Date Edited: 10/8/09 3:48pm (3 edits total) Edited By: Arawn_Fenn
Pocu posted:
So, you cannot claim the count remains the same


Yes, I can. TPM shows how a midichlorian count is taken. If taken in the same way the results would be the same.

Pocu posted:
But he obtained metal limbs which are not alive.


It doesn't matter. He has the same concentration in the remaining cells. You don't seem to understand what is meant by calling it a cell concentration.

 

-----signature-----
"You're not the devil. You're practice." - Bruce Wayne
Bless the Maker and His water. Bless the coming and going of Him. May His passage cleanse the world.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
-1_
Pocu 
Date Posted: 10/9/09 1:12am Subject: Why was Vader so loyal???
Arawn_Fenn posted:
Pocu posted:
So, you cannot claim the count remains the same

Yes, I can. TPM shows how a midichlorian count is taken. If taken in the same way the results would be the same.

OK, let's try something else. May be I am not good in explaining. I am contending that loss of limbs leads to loss of Vader's power. That is the point. I understand your point about the concentration and agree with it. It looks like the count of chromosomes in human cells that totals 46. With arms or without arms this number doesn't change in the living cells. It is a bad idea to parcel out Darth Vader's body and to count these living things.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
Pocu posted:
But he obtained metal limbs which are not alive.

It doesn't matter. He has the same concentration in the remaining cells. You don't seem to understand what is meant by calling it a cell concentration.

But it does matter happy He has parts attached to his body that are not that as capable as the others are. There should be a difference because he cannot sense the Force with them anymore.

We are not talking about the concentration, we are arguing if the total count has any significance. I just cannot agree that 'loosing the limbs together with the midichlorians doesn't change anything' without a logically explanation. If someone has lost his legs he couldn't walk and run anymore. If the fingers have been lost --> typing on keyboard and using of fork is also lost. Same applies for the eyes, ears, etc. --> This one will not be able to sense the light, or sound anymore. It is injury! And the cell concentration has nothing to do with it. As the 46 chromosomes cannot help to see and hear or to run again. In case Vader has lost these midichlorians he couldn't sense and use the Force as before just because they are just missing.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
807 posts
8156_Clone Trooper
eht13 
Date Posted: 10/9/09 8:41am Subject: Why was Vader so loyal???
I really think that SSS's post (copied below), from the thread that I linked to a little earlier, does a good job addressing this issue.


SithStarSlayer posted:
This is the best thread, EVER.

For the sake of argument, lets break Vader down into body parts, and scale it down to one cell per body part and then calculate from there.

Head = One Cell = 20,000 midis
Torso = One Cell = 20,000 midis
1/2 R.Arm = 1/2 Cell = 10,000 midis
L.Arm = One Cell = 20,000 midis
R.Leg = One Cell = 20,000 midis
L.Leg = One Cell = 20,000 midis

Vader's midichorian count is 110,000 for 5 and 1/2 'cells'...

We're going macro here, kids.

So, for the sake of not putting up a bazillion zeros; due to cell count of each limb, I've simplified the equation. Unsuited Vader on Mustafar, was missing half an arm already so I've accounted for that ahead of time.

Now, let's look at Chop-suey Vader

Head = One Cell = 20,000 midis
Torso = One Cell = 20,000 midis
1/2 R.Arm = 1/2 Cell = 10,000 midis
1/2 L.Arm = 1/2 Cell = 10,000 midis
1/2 R.Leg = 1/2 Cell = 10,000 midis
1/2 L.Leg = 1/2 Cell = 10,000 midis

Vader's midichorian TOTAL midi-count is 80,000 based upon reduced body mass...


***

Less bodymass, means less midichlorians to work with. The pre-existing concentration levels remain unchanged at 20,000 midis per cell. Losing limbs doesn't actually change cell counts, losing limbs means lost cells... lost bodymass = lost potential. And thus, the total number of midis was decreased due to those lost limbs.



 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Date Posted: 10/9/09 4:20pm Subject: Why was Vader so loyal??? - Date Edited: 10/9/09 4:27pm (4 edits total) Edited By: Arawn_Fenn
Pocu posted:
We are not talking about the concentration, we are arguing if the total count has any significance.


The test for Force sensitivity does not measure total count. The phrase "midichlorian count" as used in the films has a specific meaning, and that is the meaning I refer to when I use the phrase. You can't redefine the term to mean something completely different, and then tell me the count does not remain the same.

Pocu posted:
If someone has lost his legs he couldn't walk and run anymore. If the fingers have been lost --> typing on keyboard and using of fork is also lost. Same applies for the eyes, ears, etc. --> This one will not be able to sense the light, or sound anymore. It is injury! And the cell concentration has nothing to do with it.


Neither do "missing midichlorians". This is why "total midichlorian count" is an irrelevant statistic invented by fanon.

 

-----signature-----
"You're not the devil. You're practice." - Bruce Wayne
Bless the Maker and His water. Bless the coming and going of Him. May His passage cleanse the world.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
-1_
Pocu 
Date Posted: 10/10/09 5:39am Subject: Why was Vader so loyal??? - Date Edited: 10/10/09 5:40am (1 edits total) Edited By: Pocu
Arawn_Fenn posted:
Pocu posted:
We are not talking about the concentration, we are arguing if the total count has any significance.


The test for Force sensitivity does not measure total count. The phrase "midichlorian count" as used in the films has a specific meaning, and that is the meaning I refer to when I use the phrase. You can't redefine the term to mean something completely different, and then tell me the count does not remain the same.


We are talking about 2 different things. 'Total count of midichlorians' is just the total amount of the same in the body. Assuming that Vader has lost many of his midichlorians together with his arms and legs it should make him less powerful as before. Just because lots of them are missing. He should have lower sense of the Force.
You can just replace 'count' with 'amount' to make above difference.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Date Posted: 10/10/09 7:51am Subject: Why was Vader so loyal??? - Date Edited: 10/10/09 8:03am (2 edits total) Edited By: Arawn_Fenn
Pocu posted:
We are talking about 2 different things.


That's what I said. One of those things has significance as established by the films; the other does not.

Pocu posted:
Assuming that Vader has lost many of his midichlorians together with his arms and legs it should make him less powerful as before.


According to who? The test for Force potential as shown in the films doesn't measure the total of all midichlorians in the body. It measures cell concentration. As depicted on screen, is Vader noticeably less powerful in the Force by TESB due to not having organic arms and legs? Is Yoda less powerful in the Force by virtue of being small?

 

-----signature-----
"You're not the devil. You're practice." - Bruce Wayne
Bless the Maker and His water. Bless the coming and going of Him. May His passage cleanse the world.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
807 posts
8156_Clone Trooper
eht13 
Date Posted: 10/10/09 9:07pm Subject: Why was Vader so loyal???
Arawn_Fenn posted:
Pocu posted:
We are talking about 2 different things.


That's what I said. One of those things has significance as established by the films; the other does not.

Pocu posted:
Assuming that Vader has lost many of his midichlorians together with his arms and legs it should make him less powerful as before.


According to who? The test for Force potential as shown in the films doesn't measure the total of all midichlorians in the body. It measures cell concentration. As depicted on screen, is Vader noticeably less powerful in the Force by TESB due to not having organic arms and legs? Is Yoda less powerful in the Force by virtue of being small?

Which leads one to wonder whether the Jedi are testing this in an incomplete or less than totally accurate way. Looking at it from a logical perspective it seems they could be, but with the Yoda and TESB Vader examples in mind it seems they are not.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Date Posted: 10/11/09 9:42am Subject: Why was Vader so loyal???
If you think a midi-chlorian measurement counts all of the midis in the body, then by that logic wouldn't Yoda be among the weakest of the Jedi due to his small stature?

Midi-chlorian tests look for the average midi count in someone's cells.

Vader is not weaker due to the loss of his limbs, at least not directly. He's weaker because he is so encumbered by the suit.

 

-----signature-----
Will do moose stuff for money.
Everything tastes better wrapped in bacon, especially bacon
11/20/2008: The day I married the most wonderful woman in the world.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History